Skip to main content

Report Program

The report program defines how broader research outputs differ from advisories. An advisory is issue-specific and tied to remediation. A report can explain a method, analyze a pattern, document a defensive workflow, or summarize a research line. Reports still need review discipline because they can contain sensitive context, overstated conclusions, or unnecessary reproduction detail.

A public report should read as an accountable research artifact. It should identify the question, evidence boundary, method, limitations, findings, and defensive relevance. If the report uses aggregate records, it should link to the schema and explain what the dataset excludes. If it describes a vulnerability pattern, it should avoid unnecessary payload mechanics unless those details are needed for remediation or detection.

Report Families

FamilyUseReview Focus
MethodologyExplains how a class of review is conductedAvoid implying authorization or universal validity
Defensive AnalysisSummarizes implications for defendersKeep advice bounded to evidence and scope
Tooling NotesDocuments browser/local tooling behaviorSeparate tool output from security verdicts
Aggregate ReviewAnalyzes public records or datasetsState population, exclusion, and bias clearly
Post-Publication ReviewExplains updates after a public record changesPreserve revision history and correction rationale

Publication Criteria

A report is ready for public publication when its evidence boundary is clear, its conclusion is supported by the record, its limitations are stated, and its sensitive details have been reviewed. Reports should not be published just to fill the reports section. Empty state is better than a weak artifact.

Relationship To Advisories

When a report discusses a vulnerability that also has an advisory, the advisory remains the canonical issue record. The report can provide broader context, methodology, or aggregate analysis, but it should not conflict with the advisory timeline, remediation statement, or severity rationale.